
Do the thing where you suck relatively less than your peers.
Yesterday, Rigobon outlined competitive advantage under autarky and trade conditions. Rigobon likened free trade to the "value creation" stage of a Curhan-styled negotiation. The problem arises when "value claiming" ensues (fair trade is one of many ways to allocate the surplus).
At this point, a dominant country is inclined to claim most of the value created because:
1. they have more power/stronger BATNA
2. it "looks" like they're doing all the work and their trade partners suck (the productivity gains associated with outsourcing grunt work are easy to lose in the wash)
This is why countries which are best in the world at commodity industries (i.e. agriculture) tax their strengths to subsidize their weaknesses in higher margin products (i.e. healthcare). Rigobon would tell you this approach only makes sense if the subsidy is driving development in an area the world sucks at and your particular country sucks at everything.